1:1
First published on 29 September, this EMA reflection paper encourages early dialogue with regulators on how patient experience data can strengthen evidence packages in medicines development and marketing authorisation.

This EMA reflection paper promotes the inclusion of patient experience data (PED) in medicine development programmes and marketing authorisation applications, defining PED as data that directly reflect the patient experience without interpretation by clinicians or others. It encourages early engagement with regulators to discuss planned approaches and highlights relevant PED types and sources, including patient‑reported outcomes, patient preference studies, patient‑generated digital data, clinical trial data and real‑world data, with the aim of improving how patient experience is captured and used in regulatory decision‑making.

You might also be interested in

The session will introduce the workstream’s activities in data sharing, systematic diagnostic reanalysis, advanced diagnostic pipelines, and genomic and multi-omics innovation.
This initiative is also highly relevant from a rare diseases perspective, as paediatric cancers are rare conditions where small patient populations make robust non‑clinical proof‑of‑concept data essential for responsible and ethical trial initiation.
For rare diseases, where research often relies on limited animal models and small development teams, the regulatory acceptance of virtual control groups could help streamline early non‑clinical studies while maintaining a strong focus on patient safety.
Bringing clinicians, researchers, patient representatives and families together, the event examined how shorter diagnostic pathways depend not only on better tests, but on shared expertise, structured phenotyping and patient-centred support.