Aberrant gene expression prediction across human tissues

1:1
Altogether, we established a benchmark dataset for aberrant gene underexpression prediction in 49 human tissues, addressing an unmet need in the area of high-impact variant effect prediction.

Despite the frequent implication of aberrant gene expression in diseases, algorithms predicting aberrantly expressed genes of an individual are lacking. To address this need, we compile an aberrant expression prediction benchmark covering 8.2 million rare variants from 633 individuals across 49 tissues. While not geared toward aberrant expression, the deleteriousness score CADD and the loss-of-function predictor LOFTEE show mild predictive ability (1–1.6% average precision). Leveraging these and further variant annotations, we next train AbExp, a model that yields 12% average precision by combining in a tissue-specific fashion expression variability with variant effects on isoforms and on aberrant splicing. Integrating expression measurements from clinically accessible tissues leads to another two-fold improvement. Furthermore, we show on UK Biobank blood traits that performing rare variant association testing using the continuous and tissue-specific AbExp variant scores instead of LOFTEE variant burden increases gene discovery sensitivity and enables improved phenotype predictions.

blank

publication

Year of publication

2025

Source

Nature Communications

Author

Florian R. Hölzlwimmer, Jonas Lindner, Georgios Tsitsiridis, Nils Wagner, Francesco Paolo Casale, Vicente A. Yépez & Julien Gagneur

You might also be interested in

From 25–28 May in Barcelona, the EURORDIS-led Open Academy x ERDERA Schools will bring patient advocates and early-career researchers together for four days of rare disease training, exchange and peer learning.
A new online learning series for ERN professionals, clinicians, researchers, and stakeholders.
Children, Young People and Family Involvement and Engagement Strategy 2024-2029
Public involvement positively shapes research. By sharing their time and personal experiences with researchers, members of the public can influence what research takes place, how it’s carried out, and how the results are shared.