The impact of public involvement in health research: what are we measuring? Why are we measuring it? Should we stop measuring it?

1:1
As public involvement in the design, conduct and dissemination of health research has become an expected norm and firmly enshrined in policy, interest in measuring its impact has also grown. Despite a drive to assess the impact of public involvement, and a growing body of studies attempting to do just this, a number of questions have been largely ignored.

This commentary addresses these omissions: What is the impact of all this focus on measuring impact? How is the language of impact shaping the debate about, and the practice of, public involvement in health research? And how have shifting conceptualisations of public involvement in health research shaped, and been shaped by, the way we think about and measure impact? We argue that the focus on impact risks distorting how public involvement in health research is conceptualised and practised, blinding us to possible negative impacts.

Year of publication

2026

Author

Jill Russell, Nina Fudge & Trish Greenhalgh

You might also be interested in

Children, Young People and Family Involvement and Engagement Strategy 2024-2029
Public involvement positively shapes research. By sharing their time and personal experiences with researchers, members of the public can influence what research takes place, how it’s carried out, and how the results are shared.
Public involvement in research has evolved over the last two decades in a culture dominated by the principles of evidence-based medicine.
The impacts of involvement in research are often described in terms of the difference made to the research, the people involved and less frequently the researchers.