PPI in the Joint Funding Scheme

1:1

PPI is integrated throughout the Joint Funding Scheme. There are specific questions set out in the application form on PPI. In addition, at the Review Panel meeting, PPI is reviewed in the applications and a PPI rating contributes to the consensus panel score. It is therefore important to think about PPI from the very start of planning a research project and submitting an application to the Joint Funding Scheme.

HRCI has produced three case studies of PPI excellence in Joint Funding Scheme applications. The case studies outline the PPI plans and activities the applicants had laid out.  You can read them below and we thank the applicants and the HRCI members that they submitted their proposals to, for allowing us to share their excellent plans.

You might also be interested in

From 25–28 May in Barcelona, the EURORDIS-led Open Academy x ERDERA Schools will bring patient advocates and early-career researchers together for four days of rare disease training, exchange and peer learning.
Children, Young People and Family Involvement and Engagement Strategy 2024-2029
Public involvement positively shapes research. By sharing their time and personal experiences with researchers, members of the public can influence what research takes place, how it’s carried out, and how the results are shared.
As public involvement in the design, conduct and dissemination of health research has become an expected norm and firmly enshrined in policy, interest in measuring its impact has also grown. Despite a drive to assess the impact of public involvement, and a growing body of studies attempting to do just this, a number of questions have been largely ignored.