Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach

1:1
“We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust”

Public involvement in clinical translational research is increasingly recognised as essential for relevant and reliable research. Public involvement must be diverse and inclusive to enable research that has the potential to reach those that stand to benefit from it the most, and thus address issues of health equity. Several recent reports, however, indicate that public involvement is exclusive, including in its interactions with ethnic groups. This paper outlines a novel community-led methodology – a community sandpit – to address the inclusion of ethnic groups in public involvement in research, reports on its evaluation, findings, legacy and impact.

geralt-brainstorming-10174574_1920

Year of publication

2026

Author

Safina Islam, Olivia Joseph, Atiha Chaudry, Davine Forde, Annie Keane, Cassie Wilson, Nasima Begum, Suzanne Parsons, Tracy Grey, Leah Holmes & Bella Starling

You might also be interested in

From 25–28 May in Barcelona, the EURORDIS-led Open Academy x ERDERA Schools will bring patient advocates and early-career researchers together for four days of rare disease training, exchange and peer learning.
Children, Young People and Family Involvement and Engagement Strategy 2024-2029
Public involvement positively shapes research. By sharing their time and personal experiences with researchers, members of the public can influence what research takes place, how it’s carried out, and how the results are shared.
As public involvement in the design, conduct and dissemination of health research has become an expected norm and firmly enshrined in policy, interest in measuring its impact has also grown. Despite a drive to assess the impact of public involvement, and a growing body of studies attempting to do just this, a number of questions have been largely ignored.