EMA seeks stakeholder input on new reflection paper to reduce and replace non‑human primate use in medicines safety testing through 3Rs approaches.

EMA public consultation on non‑human primate use in safety testing

Non-human primate hand via pickpik.com (CC0)

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has launched a public consultation on a draft “Reflection paper on non-human primates in safety testing of human medicinal products and opportunities for 3Rs implementation”.

The reflection paper provides an overview of the scientific and regulatory considerations for using non‑human primates (NHPs) in the safety testing of human medicinal products. It reviews current uses, highlights existing flexibility in applying the 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement), and points to emerging alternatives that could further reduce or replace NHP use in the future.

NHPs should be used for regulatory safety testing only as a last resort. The document outlines current opportunities to reduce, refine or replace their use in pharmaceutical development and describes scientific advances that may soon gain broader regulatory acceptance.

Progress in novel, including non‑animal, approaches is scientifically and ethically essential and will depend on continued innovation, collaboration and proactive regulatory engagement.

The draft document is open for consultation, and stakeholders can provide input until 31 January 2026 via the EMA website: Non-human primates in safety testing of human medicinal products and opportunities for 3Rs implementation – scientific guideline.

News & Updates

You might also be interested in

A new online learning series for ERN professionals, clinicians, researchers, and stakeholders.
The session will introduce the workstream’s activities in data sharing, systematic diagnostic reanalysis, advanced diagnostic pipelines, and genomic and multi-omics innovation.
This initiative is also highly relevant from a rare diseases perspective, as paediatric cancers are rare conditions where small patient populations make robust non‑clinical proof‑of‑concept data essential for responsible and ethical trial initiation.
For rare diseases, where research often relies on limited animal models and small development teams, the regulatory acceptance of virtual control groups could help streamline early non‑clinical studies while maintaining a strong focus on patient safety.