For rare diseases, where research often relies on limited animal models and small development teams, the regulatory acceptance of virtual control groups could help streamline early non‑clinical studies while maintaining a strong focus on patient safety.

Towards animal-free testing: virtual control groups gain regulatory acceptance

blank

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has taken a significant step towards more ethical and innovative medicines development. Its Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has issued a draft qualification opinion on a novel methodology in non-clinical research that could reduce the number of animals used in toxicity studies.

At the core of this development is the introduction of virtual control groups, designed to replace traditional concurrent animal control groups, particularly in dose-range finding studies in rats. These virtual groups are constructed using existing control data and statistical methods, supported by expert judgement.

By qualifying this new approach methodology (NAM), the CHMP acknowledges that, within a clearly defined context of use, evidence generated using virtual control groups may be accepted as scientifically valid in future marketing authorisation applications.

While the reduction in animal use is expected to be gradual, this represents the first qualification opinion for a NAM applied to toxicity assessment, effectively establishing a blueprint for broader regulatory adoption.

Notably, the methodology could also be extended to other toxicological studies where control groups are routinely required. If scaled, the replacement of physical control groups with virtual counterparts could lead to a substantial decrease in the total number of animals used in medicines development.

Although this qualification opinion is not specific to rare diseases, it is relevant for a field where early-stage research can be constrained by small development programmes, limited disease-relevant models and the need to use available evidence as efficiently as possible. For rare disease therapy development, regulatory acceptance of well-validated, data-driven approaches could help streamline early non-clinical decision-making, provided that patient safety remains central and that historical control data are carefully selected, comparable and transparently interpreted.

This initiative is part of EMA’s broader commitment to the 3Rs principles — Replace, Reduce and Refine — in animal research. It also aligns with ongoing efforts by the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) to promote alternative testing strategies that reduce or eliminate animal use in regulatory science, while maintaining rigorous standards for safety and scientific validity.

The draft qualification opinion is currently open for public consultation from 31 March to 12 May 2026. EMA invites input from the scientific community and stakeholders, with submissions to be sent to ScientificAdvice@ema.europa.eu using the designated template.

News & Updates

You might also be interested in

This BMC Medical Ethics article examines ethics and regulatory guidance across EJP RD-funded rare disease research projects.
The European Commission has opened a Call for Evidence on the upcoming Biotech Act II — with feedback open until 10 June 2026, inviting stakeholders to submit input that will help shape the initiative before a legislative proposal is prepared.
Bringing together policy makers, researchers and data experts to align on how registry data can better support rare disease research and evidence‑based policy across Europe.
This initiative is also highly relevant from a rare diseases perspective, as paediatric cancers are rare conditions where small patient populations make robust non‑clinical proof‑of‑concept data essential for responsible and ethical trial initiation.